Luxurious Specimens

Blog · Timeline stage 6

Two Deposits, One Puzzle

Where carbonado is found, how it was mined and used, and the competing theories of its origin.

Editorial study. This essay describes no lot offered for sale. Carbonado’s origin is unresolved and debated. ASA Digital Art’s specimens are not identified as carbonado; no origin, space or otherwise, is claimed for any ASA Digital Art specimen or Luxurious Specimens lot.

Carbonado was discovered in Brazil in 1841 and named by Portuguese prospectors for its resemblance to charcoal[1]. It was later found in the Central African Republic[1]. These remain its only known sources[2,1], and it occurs in alluvial and placer deposits, never in kimberlite[3].

Its toughness made it valuable to industry. The French prized it as a polishing material, it was used for drilling during construction of the Panama Canal, and it formed part of the U.S. strategic mineral stockpile as recently as 1990[1]. At the height of alluvial mining in Brazil, from 1850 to 1870, an estimated 30,000 artisanal miners produced some 70,000 carats[1].

Haggerty examined about 800 carbonados from both countries and found no significant differences in texture, appearance or physical and chemical properties[1], which supports a common source.

The origin remains contested. Published proposals include meteorite impact[4], growth from fluids in the crust or mantle[5,6], subduction, radiation-induced formation in uranium-rich carbon[7] and an extraterrestrial origin[8,9]. Haggerty’s review weighs each and finds none uniformly accepted[1].

His objections are specific. An impact into organic-rich crust would require several cubic kilometers of uncontaminated carbon to yield the roughly two tons of carbonado recovered so far, and known impact diamonds are discrete microdiamonds[1]. Crustal or mantle fluids capable of lowering diamond’s stability limits would be hydrous and strongly oxidized, conditions in which diamond is unlikely to crystallize or survive[1]. Subduction would leave mantle minerals such as garnet and pyroxene, and none is observed[1]. Radiation produces diamond only at the nanometer scale, far smaller than carbonado’s crystals[1].

Proponents of terrestrial models reply with their own data: crustal geochemical signatures[10], water and carbonate inclusions[6], and experiments on radiation-induced diamond[7]. The disagreement is not between evidence and speculation but between different readings of the same unusual material.

← Back to this stage on the carbonado timeline

References

  1. Gems & Gemology (GIA), Summer 2017, “Carbonado Diamond: A Review of Properties and Origin.” https://www.gia.edu/gems-gemology/summer-2017-carbonado-diamond
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation news release (Jan. 9, 2007), “Diamonds from outer space: geologists discover origin of Earth's mysterious black diamonds,” via EurekAlert! https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/910688
  3. Gems & Gemology (GIA), Summer 2013 abstract, “Internal Texture and Syngenetic Inclusions in Carbonado.” https://www.gia.edu/gems-gemology/su13ab-internal-texture-and-syngenetic-inclusions-in-carbonado
  4. Smith, J. V. & Dawson, J. B. (1985). Carbonado: Diamond aggregates from early impacts of crustal rocks? Geology 13(5), 342. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1985)13%3C342:CDAFEI%3E2.0.CO;2
  5. Ishibashi, H. et al. (2012). Hydrous fluid as the growth media of natural polycrystalline diamond, carbonado. American Mineralogist. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2012.4097
  6. “Infrared and Raman spectroscopic observations of Central African carbonado and implications for its origin” (2008). European Journal of Mineralogy. https://doi.org/10.1127/0935-1221/2008/0020-1817
  7. Daulton, T. L. & Ozima, M. (1996). Radiation-induced diamond formation in uranium-rich carbonaceous materials. Science 271, 1260–1263. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5253.1260
  8. Haggerty, S. E. (2014). Carbonado: Physical and chemical properties, a critical evaluation of proposed origins, and a revised genetic model. Earth-Science Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.12.008
  9. Garai, J., Haggerty, S. E., Rekhi, S. & Chance, M. (2006). Infrared absorption investigations confirm the extraterrestrial origin of carbonado diamonds. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 653, L153–L156. https://doi.org/10.1086/510451
  10. Heaney, P. J., Vicenzi, E. P. & De, S. (2005). Strange diamonds: the mysterious origins of carbonado and framesite. Elements 1(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.1.2.85